Lexmark Legal

Successful outcomes

Selected immigration bail, tribunal appeal and judicial review outcomes in matters where Lexmark Legal acted.

High Court and Upper Tribunal decisions

The most recent outcomes appear first. Select a linked case name to open its decision or order. The case names and copies reflect applicable anonymity protections.

The judicial review entries record grants of permission and cases where the Secretary of State for the Home Department withdrew, agreed to withdraw or replaced the challenged decision. Tribunal appeal outcomes are identified separately.

  1. Permission granted · Administrative Court

    R (Elda Syla) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

    AC-2025-LON-004588

    The court granted permission to apply for judicial review on all grounds.

    Redacted copy. The case number is taken from the court’s service record.

  2. Permission granted · Administrative Court

    Claimant (identity protected) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

    The court granted permission to apply for judicial review on some of the grounds advanced.

    Document access restricted by the court.

  3. Date of consent order

    Consent order · Administrative Court

    R (Besim Germizi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

    AC-2025-LON-002095

    The Secretary of State replaced the challenged decision after reconsideration. The fresh decision remained adverse. The claim was withdrawn and costs were left for separate determination.

    Redacted copy of the court document

  4. Date of consent order

    Consent order · Administrative Court

    R (Sajmir Sinanaj) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

    AC-2025-LON-003476

    The Secretary of State issued a positive reasonable grounds decision. The parties agreed that the claim had become academic, and it was withdrawn on agreed costs terms.

    Redacted copy of the court document

  5. Upper Tribunal appeal

    EK v Secretary of State for the Home Department

    UI-2025-004014

    The Upper Tribunal set aside the dismissal of the protection and human rights appeal and ordered a fresh hearing.

  6. Consent order · Administrative Court

    R (Elidon Mjeshtri) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

    AC-2025-LON-001865

    The Home Office agreed to withdraw the challenged decision and make a fresh decision within six weeks of sealing, absent special circumstances. The order permitted withdrawal of the claim and provided for reasonable costs.

    Redacted copy of the court document

  7. Costs ruling served

    Decision withdrawn · Administrative Court

    R (Kevin Matmuja) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

    AC-2025-LON-002386

    The Secretary of State withdrew the challenged decision. The court subsequently awarded the claimant 70 per cent of their costs.

    The linked costs ruling records the withdrawal. The case number and service date are taken from the court’s covering correspondence because the ruling contains discrepancies.

  8. Withdrawal agreed · Administrative Court

    R (Dema) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

    AC-2025-LON-002712

    The Secretary of State agreed to withdraw the challenged negative reasonable grounds decision and issue a fresh decision.

    The linked document is the related costs ruling served on 20 March 2026. The sealed consent order was unavailable.

  9. Date of agreement

    Consent order · Administrative Court

    R (Adem Daci) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

    AC-2025-LON-002496

    The Secretary of State agreed to withdraw the challenged decision. The matter had been referred under the National Referral Mechanism. The order provided for reasonable costs and a payment on account.

    Redacted copy. The court approved the consent order on 15 October 2025.

  10. Upper Tribunal appeal

    BL, C1 and C2 v Secretary of State for the Home Department

    UI-2025-001491, UI-2025-001493 and UI-2025-001494

    The Upper Tribunal set aside the dismissals in three linked protection and human rights appeals and ordered fresh hearings.

  11. Upper Tribunal appeal

    MT (Vietnam) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

    UI-2025-000815

    The Upper Tribunal set aside the dismissal of the protection and human rights appeal and ordered a fresh hearing.

  12. Upper Tribunal appeal

    XQ and KQ v Secretary of State for the Home Department

    UI-2024-004294 and UI-2024-004298

    The Upper Tribunal set aside the dismissal of both asylum appeals and ordered a fresh hearing.

  13. Consent order · Administrative Court

    R (Adil Shafique) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

    AC-2023-LON-002455

    The Secretary of State agreed to withdraw the negative reasonable grounds decision and reconsider it under revised guidance. The claimant could provide further information and recover reasonable costs.

    Redacted copy of the court document

  14. Upper Tribunal appeal

    Jagtar Singh v Secretary of State for the Home Department

    HU/23656/2018

    The Upper Tribunal set aside the dismissal of the human rights appeal for procedural unfairness and ordered a fresh hearing.

  15. Upper Tribunal appeal

    Secretary of State for the Home Department v Alan [K]

    DA/00773/2018

    The Home Office challenge failed. The First-tier Tribunal’s decision allowing the deportation appeal stood.

    PDF copy of the official Word decision

Bail outcomes

The First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) granted immigration bail subject to conditions in 14 matters in which Lexmark Legal acted.

Some bail conditions must be met before a person can be released from detention.

The references below are assigned by Lexmark Legal. Each link opens a redacted copy of the original Tribunal decision.

Read about immigration bail